Latest topics
» No Objection Letter
Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:21 pm by zeph03

» CATERING SERVICES FOR CONGRESSIONAL MEET AT SAGBAYAN, BOHOL
Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:14 pm by btorres4

» PURCHASE OF FERTILIZERS FOR LIVESTOCK, CORN, HVCDP, INLAND FISHERY, AND ORGANIC PROGRAM
Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:35 pm by btorres4

» Newspaper Publication
Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:10 pm by btorres4

» RENTAL OF LIGHTS AND SOUND SYSTEM
Thu Dec 14, 2017 3:46 pm by btorres4

» Newspaper Publication
Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:50 pm by btorres4

» PURCHASE OF OTHER SUPPLIES FOR SB OFFICE
Wed Dec 13, 2017 4:51 pm by btorres4

» PURCHASE OF RICE FOR FOOD SUPPLIES OF PEACE & ORDER CAMPAIGN
Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:19 pm by btorres4

» Expired Tax Clearance during payment
Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:11 pm by vallemaco6224

» PURCHASE OF MEDICINE FOR MHO
Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:53 pm by btorres4


Non-inclusion of the Municipal Administrator in the BAC will be illegal?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Non-inclusion of the Municipal Administrator in the BAC will be illegal?

Post by lgusurallah13 on Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:45 am

The LGU reorganized the Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) and pass Executive Order to the Provincial Office. Now they returned the EO for the reason that Non-inclusion of the Municipal Administrator in the BAC will render the said EO invalid, and all procurement transaction conducted by the reorganized BAC is illegal.

It is mandatory to have a representative from the office of administrator, budget office, Legal office, Engineering Office and General Services Office? How about in the absence of one or two of the above mentioned offices, can be the composition of the BAC will be illegal? Do the said representative need also a career eligibility? Question Question study
avatar
lgusurallah13
New Member
New Member

Female Number of posts : 13
Company/Agency : LGU Surallah
Occupation/Designation : clerk lll
Registration date : 2010-10-09

Back to top Go down

Re: Non-inclusion of the Municipal Administrator in the BAC will be illegal?

Post by Jovinal on Sat Jan 07, 2012 12:49 pm

No because the phrase "but not limited to" is not inclusive.
avatar
Jovinal
Board Veteran
Board Veteran

Male Number of posts : 438
Company/Agency : LGU- Danao City
Occupation/Designation : City Accountant
Registration date : 2011-11-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Non-inclusion of the Municipal Administrator in the BAC will be illegal?

Post by jose on Sun Jan 08, 2012 6:38 pm

illegal if the the Municipal Administrator position as BAC Chairman was replaced by a non career , non permanent employee !

jose
New Member
New Member

Male Number of posts : 18
Company/Agency : Ako Ang Pilipino Ngayun
Occupation/Designation : founder
Registration date : 2011-10-13

Back to top Go down

Re: Non-inclusion of the Municipal Administrator in the BAC will be illegal?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum