Latest topics
» Lease of Office Space
Today at 9:58 am by judayski

» Supplemental Bid Bulliten
Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:57 pm by btorres4

» Financial requirement for joint venture
Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:31 am by candice

» settling requests for reconsideration re: liquidated damages
Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:49 am by regina avelino

» Annex H of the 2016 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations
Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:38 am by regina avelino

» PhilGEPS membership requirement for Alternative Modes
Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:11 am by regina avelino

» Supply Officer as regular member of BAC
Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:01 am by regina avelino

» DOLE DA 18-A
Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:56 am by regina avelino

» Latest PCAB License
Thu Aug 03, 2017 5:26 pm by dagmars

» test papers for government schools
Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:47 am by regina avelino

Awarding of Contract of the project still under motion of reconsideration and/or under protest by the bidders?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Awarding of Contract of the project still under motion of reconsideration and/or under protest by the bidders?

Post by redxet on Tue Apr 02, 2013 4:22 pm

The BAC disqualified certain bidder in one of the bidding of DENR-NGP project and the said in-eligible bidder file a motion of reconsideration within 3 days address to the HOPE, Attention to the BAC Chair. The BAC failed to response and failed to send their reply to the said Bidder within 7 calendar days as prescribed in Section 23.3 of IRR of RA 9184. The expected reason of the BAC is they coursed thru their reply to the Motion of Reconsideration to the HOPE and the said reply letter still to be acted by the HOPE but the period for sending their reply to the said bidder is already beyond 15 calendar days including holidays of the holy week. The BAC and/or HOPE already awarded the contract to the bidder which had the lowest responsive calculated bid.
Is the awarding of the contract without resolving first the MR/Protest valid/legal? In lieu of seemingly incoherent position of both complainant/petitioner and the BAC/HOPE on the application of Section 57 of IRR of RA 9184.

Please guide us on what to do to stop the awarding of the contract under complaint (MR). Is the move of the BAC/HOPE, a pre-emptive action that the issuance of TRO by the Court is moot and academic since the BAC/HOPE already awarded the contract before it reaches to the jurisdiction of the court? If the action of the BAC/HOPE is not in accordance to law hence not valid/legal What remedial action or sanction can be applied?

New Member
New Member

Male Number of posts : 26
Company/Agency : Manglares Coastal Resources Management Foundation, Inc.
Occupation/Designation : Executive Director
Registration date : 2012-10-06

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum