BAC resolved to recommend small value procurement instead of public bidding

View previous topic View next topic Go down

BAC resolved to recommend small value procurement instead of public bidding

Post by mjong on Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:09 pm

Case:
BAC members resolved to recommend small value procurement as mode of procurement of well milled rice
for the supplemental feeding of day care children (included in the AIP of MSWD Office and not considered as emergency purchase)
amounting to Php 186,884.00.

Section 53.9 authorizes small value procurement where the procurement does not fall under Shopping in Section 52
of the IRR and the amount involved does not exceed the threshold prescribed in "Annex H of the IRR".

For a second class municipality, the threshold is 100,000.00.

Clearly they violated Section 53.9 of the IRR of RA 9184.

Facts: The BAC Vice-Chairman is the sister-in-law of the Supplier, thus 2nd degree of affinity applies.

Question: What penal, civil or administrative sanctions can be meted to the erring individuals (BAC Members and the HOPE)?
Question: Is disclosure of relationship only being applied to bid procurement? How about shopping and small value procurement?

mjong
New Member
New Member

Male Number of posts : 3
Company/Agency : LGU
Occupation/Designation : Supply Officer
Registration date : 2015-10-21

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum